On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 06:17:22PM +0200, Jens Reyer wrote:
> On 25.04.21 16:27, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > bullseye users would also benefit more from wine 6.0 in
> > bullseye-backports
>
> I maintained the wine backports in the past, but stepped down
> (https://lists.debian.org/debian-wine/2020/09/m
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 06:17:22PM +0200, Jens Reyer wrote:
> On 25.04.21 16:27, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > bullseye users would also benefit more from wine 6.0 in
> > bullseye-backports
>
> I maintained the wine backports in the past, but stepped down
> (https://lists.debian.org/debian-wine/2020/09/m
Hi
On 25.04.21 16:27, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> bullseye users would also benefit more from wine 6.0 in
> bullseye-backports
[not commenting on the whole issue]
I maintained the wine backports in the past, but stepped down
(https://lists.debian.org/debian-wine/2020/09/msg7.html).
But I agree tha
Source: wine-development
Version: 5.6-2
Severity: serious
wine-development has already missed the deadline for bullseye,
but IMHO this is a good thing and it should be removed from Debian.
There is only limited value in having the ancient development
release 4.2 in buster today, users would have
4 matches
Mail list logo
