On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 10:43:05AM +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 13:39 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>
> As a user, I don't even know about all the stuff that could be better;
> pitivi worked ok for me as an amateur video editor. It just failed at
> the end of the process,
On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 13:39 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
As a user, I don't even know about all the stuff that could be better;
pitivi worked ok for me as an amateur video editor. It just failed at
the end of the process, rendering the video. So from my PoV, the
version in bullseye is fine once
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:45:39PM +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 11:16 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> The version of pitivi in bullseye is affected by the bug listed above:
> rendered videos have A/V out of sync by a few seconds, while they sound
>
On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 11:16 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Dear Maintainer,
The version of pitivi in bullseye is affected by the bug listed above:
rendered videos have A/V out of sync by a few seconds, while they sound
just find in the preview.
I'm attaching the upstream patch that fixed the iss
Package: pitivi
Version: 2020.09.2-2
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Forwarded: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pitivi/-/issues/2498
Dear Maintainer,
The version of pitivi in bullseye is affected by the bug listed above:
rendered videos have A/V out of
5 matches
Mail list logo