Quoting Xavier (2021-01-19 11:56:33)
[ quotes seemingly not directly related snipped ]
> Notes:
> * I'm not the author of the breakage, I did no source update on this
>package (just fixed node-uglify problem)
> * The breakage came before soft-freeze
> * I just tried to fix RC bug since nob
On 2021-01-19 14:15, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> It is not about breaking as such, but breaking without coordination and
> planning that is the problem. We have a release team and transition process
> for a reason. I don't think uploading breaking changes without giving
> adequate notice and warning
Le 19/01/2021 à 11:11, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> Quoting Xavier (2021-01-18 22:16:30)
>> Le 18/01/2021 à 18:47, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 2:28 pm, Antonio Terceiro
>>> wrote:
But the fact is that all the other reverse dependencies that used
any plugin
Quoting Xavier (2021-01-18 22:16:30)
> Le 18/01/2021 à 18:47, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 2:28 pm, Antonio Terceiro
> > wrote:
> >> But the fact is that all the other reverse dependencies that used
> >> any plugin now need to be changed accordingly. Otherwise we can
On 2021, ജനുവരി 19 2:46:30 AM IST, Xavier wrote:
>Le 18/01/2021 à 18:47, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
>Maintaining an unsupported version means taking the risk to be unable to
>backport a security fix during stable life and LTS (we already have many
>examples).
>_Before freeze_, I prefer having upd
Hi,
FYI I have reopened this bug in a separate control message.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 05:09:16PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 07:20:12PM +0100, Martin wrote:
> > On 2021-01-18 14:28, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > > In special, I need to stop including the standalone pl
Le 18/01/2021 à 18:47, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 2:28 pm, Antonio Terceiro
> wrote:
>> But the fact is that all the other reverse dependencies that used any
>> plugin now need to be changed accordingly. Otherwise we can just wait
>> for their chart features to break in
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 07:20:12PM +0100, Martin wrote:
> On 2021-01-18 14:28, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > In special, I need to stop including the standalone plugin files,
> > because it's already included in the main file. This wasn't the case in
> > the previous version, and I get that this is h
On 2021-01-18 14:28, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> In special, I need to stop including the standalone plugin files,
> because it's already included in the main file. This wasn't the case in
> the previous version, and I get that this is how upstream designed it to
> be.
Pretty "hacky" idea: How about
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 2:28 pm, Antonio Terceiro
wrote:
But the fact is that all the other reverse dependencies that used any
plugin now need to be changed accordingly. Otherwise we can just wait
for their chart features to break in subtle ways in the face of users.
Not specific to this b
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 12:03:54PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
[...]
> After a bit of investigation, this looks more like a larger change in
> API of the package. In the previous version:
>
> - the main jquery.flot.js does *not* include the plugins
> - minified versions of the plugins are
11 matches
Mail list logo
