On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 09:41:28 +0200 Tristan Seligmann
wrote:
> I think the upper bound is just bogus and should be removed. Upstream
> seems to have added it under the assumption that cryptography follows
> semver, but it does not: 2.9 to 3.0 offers the same compatibility
> guarantees as 2.8 to 2.9
I think the upper bound is just bogus and should be removed. Upstream
seems to have added it under the assumption that cryptography follows
semver, but it does not: 2.9 to 3.0 offers the same compatibility
guarantees as 2.8 to 2.9.
2 matches
Mail list logo
