Bug#946563: there is no need for a versioned libxcrypt1-dev package

2019-12-26 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2019-12-11 Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Dec 11, Matthias Klose wrote: > > there is really no need for a versioned libxcrypt1-dev package. > > Please rename that properly to libxcrypt-dev. > Can you be more specific in why this would not be allowed? > Currently I am not building libxcrypt2 and lib

Bug#946563: there is no need for a versioned libxcrypt1-dev package

2019-12-14 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Dec 11, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Dec 11, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > there is really no need for a versioned libxcrypt1-dev package. Please > > rename > > that properly to libxcrypt-dev. > Can you be more specific in why this would not be allowed? > Currently I am not building libxcrypt2 an

Bug#946563: there is no need for a versioned libxcrypt1-dev package

2019-12-10 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Dec 11, Matthias Klose wrote: > there is really no need for a versioned libxcrypt1-dev package. Please rename > that properly to libxcrypt-dev. Can you be more specific in why this would not be allowed? Currently I am not building libxcrypt2 and libxcrypt2-dev, but the package is ready to do

Bug#946563: there is no need for a versioned libxcrypt1-dev package

2019-12-10 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: src:libxcrypt Version: 1:4.4.10-5 Severity: serious Tags: sid bullseye there is really no need for a versioned libxcrypt1-dev package. Please rename that properly to libxcrypt-dev.