Bug#943943: getfem++ ftbfs on s390x where it built before

2019-12-20 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: reopen -1 Control: retitle -1 getfem++ ftbfs on s390x where it built before getfem++ 5.3+dfsg1-2 still FTFS on at least s390x and ppc64

Bug#943943: getfem++ ftbfs

2019-12-19 Thread Konstantinos Poulios
the latest ftbfs on all architectures seems more like a python2to3 transition issue /usr/bin/env: ‘python’: No such file or directory

Bug#943943: getfem++ ftbfs on s390x where it built before

2019-12-18 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: retitle -1 getfem++ ftbfs with mumps 5.2.1 Hi, On 17-12-2019 22:05, Paul Gevers wrote: > Your package is part of the "scalapack mumps petsc slepc" transition and > I scheduled binNMU's on all other archs. > > Can you please fix your package? If it remains in the current state for > too

Bug#943943: getfem++ ftbfs on s390x where it built before

2019-12-17 Thread Paul Gevers
On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 12:00:12 +0100 Matthias Klose wrote: > getfem++ ftbfs on s390x where it built before, test failures. > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=getfem%2B%2B > shows that all other 64bit big endian targets also fail. Your package is part of the "scalapack mumps petsc sl

Bug#943943: getfem++ ftbfs on s390x where it built before

2019-11-01 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: src:getfem++ Version: 5.3+dfsg1-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid bullseye getfem++ ftbfs on s390x where it built before, test failures. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=getfem%2B%2B shows that all other 64bit big endian targets also fail.