Olivier Sallou writes:
>> Olivier, will you have time to integrate these changes, or should I?
>
> no time for the moment, if you can do it, I would appreciate
No problem, I should be able to take cafe of it later this week.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
h
On 12/9/18 5:11 PM, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Andreas Metzler writes:
>
>> ncbi-blast+ FTBFS on current sid:
> Thanks for the report! It looks like ncbi-blast+ needs another round of
> formal patches for compatibility with current Boost. The following
> upstream changes should collectively take c
Andreas Metzler writes:
> ncbi-blast+ FTBFS on current sid:
Thanks for the report! It looks like ncbi-blast+ needs another round of
formal patches for compatibility with current Boost. The following
upstream changes should collectively take care of it:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/viewvc/v1?v
Source: ncbi-blast+
Version: 2.7.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
Hello,
ncbi-blast+ FTBFS on current sid:
LIBRARIES: build as dynamic by default
FEATURES: GCC MT LFS DLL DLL_BUILD unix WinMain Linux
PACKAGES:
enabled: Iconv Z BZ2 PCRE MBEDTLS GMP GMP NETTLE
4 matches
Mail list logo
