Michael Stone dixit:
> So that's basically just the --rng-entropy argument? If we switch rng-tools5
> to
/usr/lib/stunnel/arngc-slrd | runtunnel | \
rngd -f -r /proc/self/fd/0 -H 0.99 -B 2 \
-s 32 -W "$threshold" -t 300 -T 60
I just had the idea of “castling”¹, t
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 04:12:24PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Yes, exactly: it's definitely better for a certain class of hardware, but I'm
honestly just not sure whether any of those are still relevant. (Like, do they
work with current kernels, are they in hardware that's otherwise supported,
Michael Stone dixit:
> Yes, exactly: it's definitely better for a certain class of hardware, but I'm
> honestly just not sure whether any of those are still relevant. (Like, do they
> work with current kernels, are they in hardware that's otherwise supported,
> etc.?) I'd love to see reports from
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 05:19:13AM -0500, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019, at 10:36, Michael Stone wrote:
Yes, but most of those features are obsolescent at best. I'm not clear
on what functionality is actually being used. (I'm hesitant to remove
"old" rng-tools is bett
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019, at 10:36, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 01:15:13PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> >On zondag 20 januari 2019 16:59:11 CET Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> >> I’m very much against just saying this package
> >> “should not exist”
Yeah, what should not exist are NMUs
On maandag 21 januari 2019 13:34:19 CET Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 01:15:13PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> >On zondag 20 januari 2019 16:59:11 CET Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> >> I’m very much against just saying this package
> >> “should not exist”
> >
> >I'm inclined to agree
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 01:15:13PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
On zondag 20 januari 2019 16:59:11 CET Thorsten Glaser wrote:
I’m very much against just saying this package
“should not exist”
I'm inclined to agree with this as the source (+ features/parameters) for this
package is substantia
On zondag 20 januari 2019 16:59:11 CET Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> I’m very much against just saying this package
> “should not exist”
I'm inclined to agree with this as the source (+ features/parameters) for this
package is substantially different from rng-tools/rng-tools5.
AFAICT the problem star
8 matches
Mail list logo
