On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 02:42:42PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 09:31:32AM +0200, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
> >
> > I would guess that the culprit is the following unit test in bwdist:
> >
> > ## The quasi-euclidean method is apparently sensitive to a machine precision
> >
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 08:08:58PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 02:42:42PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 09:31:32AM +0200, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
> > >
> > > I would guess that the culprit is the following unit test in bwdist:
> > >
> > > #
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 09:31:32AM +0200, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
>
> I would guess that the culprit is the following unit test in bwdist:
>
> ## The quasi-euclidean method is apparently sensitive to a machine precision
> ## error that happens in x86 systems only. This test will cause an endles
* Adrian Bunk [2017-08-07 01:57]:
Source: octave-image
Version: 2.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
Some recent change in unstable and buster makes octave-image FTBFS on i386:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/octave-image.html
https://tests.reproducible-builds.or
4 matches
Mail list logo