debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Bcc:
Subject: Re: Bug#870635: mutt package is not using the official mutt tarball
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <2017074105.iz5bje4kgkl3q...@cherubino.dyne.org>
CCing -devel because I think this might be of wider interest.
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 07:41:05AM
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 09:52:06AM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 10:21:51PM +, Antonio Radici wrote:
> > as I said on the original thread I'm planning to fix this, and as you
> > can see there have been no new releases until the fix is in place.
>
> It would be great
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 10:21:51PM +, Antonio Radici wrote:
as I said on the original thread I'm planning to fix this, and as you
can see there have been no new releases until the fix is in place.
It would be great if you could summarize *in this bug* what's your plan
of action.
We are p
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 09:33:09AM -0700, Kevin McCarthy wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.8.3+neomutt20170609-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.3
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I am the upstream project maintainer of Mutt. Your version of the
> "mutt" package in unstable and testing i
Package: mutt
Version: 1.8.3+neomutt20170609-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
Dear Maintainer,
I am the upstream project maintainer of Mutt. Your version of the
"mutt" package in unstable and testing is based on the NeoMutt
tarball, not the official Mutt 1.8.3 release tarball.
If y
5 matches
Mail list logo
