On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 00:29 +0100, Thomas Liske wrote:
> could you please verify if there is a user named "needrestart-dbus"? The
> package seems no creating the required user. Maybe this report is a
> duplicate of #857077.
There is no needrestart-dbus user on my system.
--
bye,
pabs
https://w
Hi Paul,
could you please verify if there is a user named "needrestart-dbus"? The
package seems no creating the required user. Maybe this report is a
duplicate of #857077.
TIA,
Thomas
Paul Wise writes:
> On Sun, 2017-03-05 at 23:24 +0100, Thomas Liske wrote:
>
>> the package's core function
On Sun, 2017-03-05 at 23:24 +0100, Thomas Liske wrote:
> the package's core functionally is the needrestart-session command - does
> it working for you?
When I run needrestart as a user, I get a lot of processes that need
restarting but when I run needrestart-session, it says this:
Nothing found
tags 855788 more-info upstream
thanks
Hi pabs,
Paul Wise writes:
> On Thu, 2017-03-02 at 23:30 +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
>
>> FWIW, no such problem here. Is that high severity really warranted ?
>
> The package is not working for me at all. I assumed that the reason
the package's core funct
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 855788 more-info upstream
Unknown tag/s: more-info.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fix
On Thu, 2017-03-02 at 23:30 +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> FWIW, no such problem here. Is that high severity really warranted ?
The package is not working for me at all. I assumed that the reason
no-one else reported the same issue was that no-one else was using the
package and verifying that it wor
FWIW, no such problem here. Is that high severity really warranted ?
7 matches
Mail list logo
