Bug#851792: palo ships binary in the sources

2017-01-21 Thread Helge Deller
> On 21.01.2017 10:50, Christoph Biedl wrote: >> However, after applying palo builds on amd64 and produces an iplboot of >> the same size but with partially different content. Helge, might want to >> burn one your boxes trying out? :-) Thanks! Seems to work fine (with minor modification). I did so

Bug#851792: palo ships binary in the sources

2017-01-21 Thread Helge Deller
On 21.01.2017 10:50, Christoph Biedl wrote: > Helge Deller wrote... > >> On 18.01.2017 20:40, Adrian Bunk wrote: >>> Package: palo >> ... >>> If palo should continue to be available on non-hppa machines, >>> a (binary-all) package that uses gcc-hppa-linux-gnu for building >>> might be an option. >

Bug#851792: palo ships binary in the sources

2017-01-21 Thread Christoph Biedl
Helge Deller wrote... > On 18.01.2017 20:40, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Package: palo > ... > > If palo should continue to be available on non-hppa machines, > > a (binary-all) package that uses gcc-hppa-linux-gnu for building > > might be an option. > > I'll check if it's possile. May take some time

Bug#851792: palo ships binary in the sources

2017-01-19 Thread Helge Deller
On 18.01.2017 20:40, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: palo ... > If palo should continue to be available on non-hppa machines, > a (binary-all) package that uses gcc-hppa-linux-gnu for building > might be an option. I'll check if it's possile. May take some time. Helge

Bug#851792: palo ships binary in the sources

2017-01-18 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: palo Version: 1.95 Severity: serious >From debian/rules: @if [ `dpkg --print-architecture` = hppa ]; \ then \ echo "Regenerating iplboot."; \ $(MAKE) realclean; \ $(MAKE) iplboot; \ else \ echo "Lea