On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 04:55:30PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Wait what? Packages that build depend on a package that is not in
> stretch are in stretch? WTF?
Britney doesn't check build dependencies.
--
Sean Whitton
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 04:40:00PM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Thursday, 17 November 2016 9:44:39 PM AEDT Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > firefox-dev is not in stretch, and it is not planned that it
> > ever will be (see #817954).
> >
> > firefox-esr-dev might be the alternative, but the Mozilla main
On Thursday, 17 November 2016 9:44:39 PM AEDT Adrian Bunk wrote:
> firefox-dev is not in stretch, and it is not planned that it
> ever will be (see #817954).
>
> firefox-esr-dev might be the alternative, but the Mozilla maintainers
> (Cc'ed on this bug) should be able to give a more definite answe
Source: stylish
Version: 2.0.3-1
Severity: serious
firefox-dev is not in stretch, and it is not planned that it
ever will be (see #817954).
firefox-esr-dev might be the alternative, but the Mozilla maintainers
(Cc'ed on this bug) should be able to give a more definite answer
on that.
4 matches
Mail list logo