Bug#844121: Remote crash in MaraDNS 2.0.13

2016-12-03 Thread Sam Trenholme
This email concerns CVE-2016-9300, CVE-2016-9301, and CVE-2016-9302. I have written a utility to send the packets that supposedly remotely crash MaraDNS to MaraDNS via UDP. The packets do not crash MaraDNS when sent over the network; I can only crash MaraDNS with the offending packets by using the

Bug#844121: Remote crash in MaraDNS 2.0.13

2016-12-03 Thread Sam Trenholme
Github bug: https://github.com/samboy/MaraDNS/issues/33 Please go here to get the latest updates from upstream about this issue. On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Sam Trenholme wrote: > Hello there, > > I have just become aware of this bug. Right now, I can reproduce the crash > in Cygwin 64-bit,

Bug#844121: Remote crash in MaraDNS 2.0.13

2016-12-03 Thread Sam Trenholme
Hello there, I have just become aware of this bug. Right now, I can reproduce the crash in Cygwin 64-bit, but am unable to reproduce the crash in my 32-bit CentOS6 development environment where I would actually be able to get a full stack trace (which was not provided in the original bug report).

Bug#844121: Remote crash in MaraDNS 2.0.13

2016-11-14 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Control: retitle -1 maradns: CVE-2016-9300 CVE-2016-9301 CVE-2016-9302 Hi, Three CVEs have been assigned in meanwhile for the found issues. Cf. http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/14/8 Regards, Salvatore

Processed: Re: Bug#844121: Remote crash in MaraDNS 2.0.13

2016-11-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 maradns: CVE-2016-9300 CVE-2016-9301 CVE-2016-9302 Bug #844121 [src:maradns] Remote crash in MaraDNS 2.0.13 Changed Bug title to 'maradns: CVE-2016-9300 CVE-2016-9301 CVE-2016-9302' from 'Remote crash in MaraDNS 2.0.13'. -- 844121: http://bugs.debian.or

Bug#844121: Remote crash in MaraDNS 2.0.13

2016-11-12 Thread Luciano Bello
Source: maradns Severity: grave Version: 2.0.13-1.2 Tags: security upstream Hi, The following vulnerability was published for MaraDNS: http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/411 No CVE is was assigned yet, but the request was made in that thread. If you fix the vulnerability please also make sure