Il giorno lun, 24/10/2016 alle 16.28 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig
(Debian/GNU) ha scritto:
>
> On 2016-10-24 13:48, Pietro Battiston wrote:
> >
> > Il giorno lun, 24/10/2016 alle 12.06 +0200, Fabian Greffrath ha
> > scritto:
> > >
> > > It's just a wild guess, but this
> > >
> > > Pietro Battiston
On 2016-10-24 13:48, Pietro Battiston wrote:
> Il giorno lun, 24/10/2016 alle 12.06 +0200, Fabian Greffrath ha
> scritto:
>> It's just a wild guess, but this
>>
>> Pietro Battiston wrote:
>>>
>>> Package: ardour
>>> Version: 1:5.4.0~dfsg-1
>> [...]
>>>
>>> ii ardour-data 1:
Il giorno lun, 24/10/2016 alle 12.06 +0200, Fabian Greffrath ha
scritto:
> It's just a wild guess, but this
>
> Pietro Battiston wrote:
> >
> > Package: ardour
> > Version: 1:5.4.0~dfsg-1
> [...]
> >
> > ii ardour-data 1:4.2~dfsg-5
>
> just doesn't seem corect to me!
>
It's just a wild guess, but this
Pietro Battiston wrote:
> Package: ardour
> Version: 1:5.4.0~dfsg-1
[...]
> ii ardour-data 1:4.2~dfsg-5
just doesn't seem corect to me!
- Fabian
On 2016-10-24 11:51, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
> would it be possible for you to (privately) send me a segfaulting
> project (without the data files), so that i have a known-to-fail project
> for testing?
i think i have found the culprit.
i will upload a hopefully-fixed package soon (
On 2016-10-24 10:38, Pietro Battiston wrote:
> Il giorno lun, 24/10/2016 alle 09.31 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig ha
> scritto:
>> [...]
>> is it possible to try the ardour5 binary provided by upstream [1] and
>> see whether the problem persists?
>>
>
> I just did (with the "Free/Demo" version), and i
Il giorno lun, 24/10/2016 alle 09.31 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig ha
scritto:
> [...]
> is it possible to try the ardour5 binary provided by upstream [1] and
> see whether the problem persists?
>
I just did (with the "Free/Demo" version), and it works perfectly (with
the same session/jack configurat
On 2016-10-24 00:11, Pietro Battiston wrote:
> Package: ardour
> Version: 1:5.4.0~dfsg-1
> Severity: grave
>
> Ardour 1:4.7~dfsg-2 works great. If instead I upgrade to 1:5.3~dfsg-1 (current
> unstable) or 1:5.4.0~dfsg-1 (current testing), I get a segfault when I try to
> load any project.
thanks
Package: ardour
Version: 1:5.4.0~dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Ardour 1:4.7~dfsg-2 works great. If instead I upgrade to 1:5.3~dfsg-1 (current
unstable) or 1:5.4.0~dfsg-1 (current testing), I get a segfault when I try to
load any project.
I am attaching a gdb run (from 1:5.4.0~dfsg-1).
-- System Infor
9 matches
Mail list logo