On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 02:58:53PM +, Tobias Hansen wrote:
>...
> (I'm not sure if some of these flags (mmx, sse ?) are allowed
> on i386 and didn't find that info. Ximin, do you know this?)
None of these is allowed on i386.
The baseline for i386 in stretch is the Pentium Pro,
that has neithe
On 11/29/2016 03:53 PM, Doug Torrance wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 src:givaro
>
> On 11/29/2016 09:58 AM, Tobias Hansen wrote:
>> I think I figured out at least the test failures with "Illegal
>> instruction" on i386. The problem is that givaro is built using cpu
>> extensions that are not allowe
Control: reassign -1 src:givaro
On 11/29/2016 09:58 AM, Tobias Hansen wrote:
I think I figured out at least the test failures with "Illegal
instruction" on i386. The problem is that givaro is built using cpu
extensions that are not allowed.
Jerome figured out in [1] that the problem happens whe
Hi Doug,
I think I figured out at least the test failures with "Illegal
instruction" on i386. The problem is that givaro is built using cpu
extensions that are not allowed.
Jerome figured out in [1] that the problem happens when givaro code is
called. And sure enough:
objdump -S /usr/lib/i386-li
Source: linbox
Version: 1.4.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
The i386 build of linbox failed:
../build-aux/test-driver: line 107: 16085 Illegal instruction "$@" >
$log_file 2>&1
FAIL: test-cra
[...]
../build-aux/test
5 matches
Mail list logo
