Bug#828564: sx: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-12-06 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2016-12-05 22:36:39 [+0100], László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > Hi Sebastian, Hi László, > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > > Okay. What do we do here? Any idea Laszlo? > > I could try to cherry-pick the three patches into the currect 2.0 but I > > can't look at them

Bug#828564: sx: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-12-05 Thread Török Edwin
On 2016-12-05 23:36, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > wrote: >> On 2016-10-09 11:38:37 [+0300], Török Edwin wrote: >>> Patches to build with both OpenSSL 1.0.x, and 1.1.0 are available in the >>> upstream git reposit

Bug#828564: sx: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-12-05 Thread Török Edwin
On 2016-12-05 23:20, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2016-10-09 11:38:37 [+0300], Török Edwin wrote: >> Dear Maintainer, >> >> Patches to build with both OpenSSL 1.0.x, and 1.1.0 are available in the >> upstream git repository: >> https://gitweb.skylable.com/gitweb/?p=sx.git;a=commitdiff;h=5

Bug#828564: sx: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-12-05 Thread GCS
Hi Sebastian, On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2016-10-09 11:38:37 [+0300], Török Edwin wrote: >> Patches to build with both OpenSSL 1.0.x, and 1.1.0 are available in the >> upstream git repository: >> https://gitweb.skylable.com/gitweb/?p=sx.git;a=commitdif

Bug#828564: sx: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-12-05 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2016-10-09 11:38:37 [+0300], Török Edwin wrote: > Dear Maintainer, > > Patches to build with both OpenSSL 1.0.x, and 1.1.0 are available in the > upstream git repository: > https://gitweb.skylable.com/gitweb/?p=sx.git;a=commitdiff;h=5acd940e97aa1f2bd1b3fdd41f4c98a5783fcb44 > https://gitweb.sky