06.11.2016 в 23:39:41 +0100 Bernhard Schmidt написал(а):
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 04:39:03PM +0400, Stepan Golosunov wrote:
> > 06.11.2016 в 16:18:32 +0400 Stepan Golosunov написал:
> > > #if defined(HAVE_OPENSSL) && OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x1010L
> > > /* No explicit initialization is nee
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 04:39:03PM +0400, Stepan Golosunov wrote:
Hi,
> 06.11.2016 в 16:18:32 +0400 Stepan Golosunov написал:
> > 03.11.2016 в 09:24:19 +0100 Bernhard Schmidt написал(а):
> > > - Asterisk is doing some weird stuff with macros in
> > >
> > > https://sources.debian.net/src/asteri
06.11.2016 в 16:18:32 +0400 Stepan Golosunov написал:
> 03.11.2016 в 09:24:19 +0100 Bernhard Schmidt написал(а):
> > - Asterisk is doing some weird stuff with macros in
> >
> > https://sources.debian.net/src/asterisk/1:13.11.2~dfsg-1/main/libasteriskssl.c/
> > that causes the build against 1.1
03.11.2016 в 09:24:19 +0100 Bernhard Schmidt написал(а):
> - Asterisk is doing some weird stuff with macros in
>
> https://sources.debian.net/src/asterisk/1:13.11.2~dfsg-1/main/libasteriskssl.c/
> that causes the build against 1.1.0 to fail. This is beyond my C
> knowledge. I will gladly tes
Control: tags -1 help
Hi,
current state on this:
- There is no progress visible in the upstream bugtracker, I have also
not found anything in other distros (Fedora etc.)
- switching to libssl1.0-dev does not work for now because the
build-deps
libc-client2007e-dev
libpjproj
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 help
Bug #828240 [src:asterisk] asterisk: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
Added tag(s) help.
--
828240: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828240
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
6 matches
Mail list logo
