Control: severity -1 important
Control: severity 824442 important
On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 23:20 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2017-04-11 03:35, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Control: tag -1 moreinfo
> >
> > On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:48:45 +0200 Aurelien Jarno
> > wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Unfortunately
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #860013 [linux] linux: libc-compat.h sets __UAPI_DEF_IF_* to 1 even when
if.h hasn't been included
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> severity 824442 important
Bug #824442 [src:glibc] and conflict needs to be
resolved
Severity
On 2017-04-11 03:35, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:48:45 +0200 Aurelien Jarno
> wrote:
> [...]
> > Unfortunately I have been pointed on the libc-alpha mailing list that
> > it doesn't work if another file which includes
> > (e.g. ) is included befor
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:48:45 +0200 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
[...]
> Unfortunately I have been pointed on the libc-alpha mailing list that
> it doesn't work if another file which includes
> (e.g. ) is included before . The problem is
> that the __UAPI_DEF_IF_* constants are
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #860013 [linux] linux: libc-compat.h sets __UAPI_DEF_IF_* to 1 even when
if.h hasn't been included
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
860013: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860013
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.or
tag 824442 - pending
clone 824442 -1
reassign -1 linux
retitle -1 linux: libc-compat.h sets __UAPI_DEF_IF_* to 1 even when if.h hasn't
been included
thanks
> On 2017-03-04 17:23, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 20:36:43 +0100 Aurelien Jarno
> > wrote:
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > Now th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 824442 - pending
Bug #824442 [src:glibc] and conflict needs to be
resolved
Removed tag(s) pending.
> clone 824442 -1
Bug #824442 [src:glibc] and conflict needs to be
resolved
Bug 824442 cloned as bug 860013
> reassign -1 linux
Bug #86001
control: forwarded -1 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21367
On 2017-03-04 17:23, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 20:36:43 +0100 Aurelien Jarno
> wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > Now that the change have been done on the kernel side, the bug is not
> > really visible anymore, s
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21367
Bug #824442 [src:glibc] and conflict needs to be
resolved
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21367'.
--
824442: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 20:36:43 +0100 Aurelien Jarno
wrote:
> [...]
>
> Now that the change have been done on the kernel side, the bug is not
> really visible anymore, so nobody really cared about this bug.
>
> I'll see if I can come with a patch in the next days.
>
> Aurelien
>
> --
> Aurelien
On 2017-02-11 05:44, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2016 03:12:51 +0100 Ben Hutchings
> wrote:
> > Source: glibc
> > Version: 2.22-7
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > (Continued from bug #822393.)
> >
> > glibc's should check whether has already been
> > included and, if so, avoid making co
On Mon, 16 May 2016 03:12:51 +0100 Ben Hutchings
wrote:
> Source: glibc
> Version: 2.22-7
> Severity: serious
>
> (Continued from bug #822393.)
>
> glibc's should check whether has already been
> included and, if so, avoid making conflicting definitions.
>
> Including the headers in the oppos
Source: glibc
Version: 2.22-7
Severity: serious
(Continued from bug #822393.)
glibc's should check whether has already been
included and, if so, avoid making conflicting definitions.
Including the headers in the opposite order works since this change in
Linux 4.6:
https://git.kernel.org/linus/
13 matches
Mail list logo
