On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 04:50:17PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Thanks for your screenshot, it definitely helps. The symbol
> h_errno@GLIBC_PRIVATE has been renamed into __h_errno@GLIBC_PRIVATE in
> glibc 2.22.
>
> Normally if you use both libpthread.so.0 and libc.so.6 from glibc 2.21
> and glib
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 04:50:17PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Thanks for your screenshot, it definitely helps. The symbol
> h_errno@GLIBC_PRIVATE has been renamed into __h_errno@GLIBC_PRIVATE in
> glibc 2.22.
>
> Normally if you use both libpthread.so.0 and libc.so.6 from glibc 2.21
> and glib
On 2016-03-12 14:04, ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:15:13PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Could you please give us the exact error message you encountered,
> > including the symbol name (a photo is fine), so that we can narrow down
> > the problem? At a first glance it looks l
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:15:13PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> Could you please give us the exact error message you encountered,
> including the symbol name (a photo is fine), so that we can narrow down
> the problem? At a first glance it looks like the libc has been partially
> upgraded, and
On 2016-03-11 22:57, Chiraag Nataraj wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.22-2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> When I upgrade from libc6 2.21-9 to 2.22-2, I get the error "relocation error
> version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.
Package: libc6
Version: 2.22-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Dear Maintainer,
When I upgrade from libc6 2.21-9 to 2.22-2, I get the error "relocation error
version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6" whenever I launch most
programs (sed, grep, ls, etc.) and
6 matches
Mail list logo
