Bug#816574: marked as done (FTBFS: object cannot be interpreted as an index)

2016-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Apr 2016 10:00:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#813932: fixed in python-numpy 1:1.11.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #813932, regarding FTBFS: object cannot be interpreted as an index to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#816574: marked as done (FTBFS: object cannot be interpreted as an index)

2016-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Apr 2016 10:00:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#816369: fixed in python-numpy 1:1.11.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #816369, regarding FTBFS: object cannot be interpreted as an index to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#816574: marked as done (FTBFS: object cannot be interpreted as an index)

2016-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Apr 2016 10:00:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#816574: fixed in python-numpy 1:1.11.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #816574, regarding FTBFS: object cannot be interpreted as an index to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#816574: marked as done (FTBFS: object cannot be interpreted as an index)

2016-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Apr 2016 10:00:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#813429: fixed in python-numpy 1:1.11.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #813429, regarding FTBFS: object cannot be interpreted as an index to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has