On 14.02.2016 08:51, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2016-02-13 Daniel Stender wrote:
>> On 13.02.2016 07:52, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
>>> Is there something I can do to help? Currently reverse dependencies are
>>> broken, due to a binNMU hugin in *testing* will not run at all.
>
>> Thanks for
On 2016-02-13 Daniel Stender wrote:
> On 13.02.2016 07:52, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> > Is there something I can do to help? Currently reverse dependencies are
> > broken, due to a binNMU hugin in *testing* will not run at all.
> Thanks for the note and the offer. If you would have suggestion
On 2016-02-12 Daniel Stender wrote:
> Sorry for the delay, a fix is coming up.
> In the meanwhile I've did also a ABI check and it seems this one needs a
> transition:
> http://www.danielstender.com/uploads/compat_report.html
[...]
FWIW I have doublechecked almost all reverse deps and reverse
b
On 13.02.2016 10:37, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2016-02-13 Daniel Stender wrote:
>> On 13.02.2016 07:52, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
>>> You are going for 1.11 rc1, I assume?
>
>> That's a good idea! That's not official release candidate but would
>> be much clearer.
>
> According to dpkg-g
On 13.02.2016 10:32, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2016-02-13 Daniel Stender wrote:
> [...]
>> Ubuntu has patched -O2 for -O3 on ppc64el, but it's -O2 anyway. Is Ubuntu
>> building with -O3?
>
> Yes, Ubuntu is building with -O3 by default, at least on some archs.
Ah, yes, o.k. I'll take this in, t
On 2016-02-13 Daniel Stender wrote:
> On 13.02.2016 07:52, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> > You are going for 1.11 rc1, I assume?
> That's a good idea! That's not official release candidate but would
> be much clearer.
According to dpkg-gensymbols the ABI has not changed from
1.10.0+git20160120
On 2016-02-13 Daniel Stender wrote:
[...]
> Ubuntu has patched -O2 for -O3 on ppc64el, but it's -O2 anyway. Is Ubuntu
> building with -O3?
Yes, Ubuntu is building with -O3 by default, at least on some archs.
cu Andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so
On 13.02.2016 07:52, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2016-02-12 Daniel Stender wrote:
>> Sorry for the delay, a fix is coming up.
>
> You are going for 1.11 rc1, I assume?
That's a good idea! That's not official release candidate but would
be much clearer.
> Is there something I can do to help? Cur
On 2016-02-12 Daniel Stender wrote:
> Sorry for the delay, a fix is coming up.
You are going for 1.11 rc1, I assume?
Is there something I can do to help? Currently reverse dependencies are
broken, due to a binNMU hugin in *testing* will not run at all.
cu Andreas
--
`What a good friend you are
Sorry for the delay, a fix is coming up.
In the meanwhile I've did also a ABI check and it seems this one needs a
transition:
http://www.danielstender.com/uploads/compat_report.html
I think the change, not only the additions, could have been stated more clearly
in the changelog, though :-/
Bes
On 04.02.2016 20:26, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2016-02-01 Daniel Stender wrote:
> [...]
>> I've expected this bug to appear now. I've already prepared a fix for -2,
>> it's coming up very soon.
>
>
> Hello,
>
> GIT head seems to be missing a
>
> Package: libvigraimpex6
> +Replaces: libvigr
On 2016-02-01 Daniel Stender wrote:
[...]
> I've expected this bug to appear now. I've already prepared a fix for -2,
> it's coming up very soon.
Hello,
GIT head seems to be missing a
Package: libvigraimpex6
+Replaces: libvigraimpex5v5 (>= 1.10.0+git20160120.803d5d4-1)
cu Andreas
--
`What
On 01.02.2016 18:52, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Package: libvigraimpex5v5
> Version: 1.10.0+git20160120.803d5d4-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> (sid)ametzler@argenau:/usr/bin$ hugin
> hugin: error while loading shared libraries: libvigraimpex.so.5: cannot open
> sh
Package: libvigraimpex5v5
Version: 1.10.0+git20160120.803d5d4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
(sid)ametzler@argenau:/usr/bin$ hugin
hugin: error while loading shared libraries: libvigraimpex.so.5: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
Going from 1.10
14 matches
Mail list logo
