On 2016-01-14 04:53:31, Danny Edel wrote:
> Hi Antoine,
>
> On 01/13/2016 07:50 PM, anar...@debian.org wrote:
>> The readme is not quite accurate: *some* borg versions are actually
>> compatible across the network. It's only on the 0.29 boundary that there
>> is a problem.
>
> Is this[1] wording ac
Hi Antoine,
On 01/13/2016 07:50 PM, anar...@debian.org wrote:
> The readme is not quite accurate: *some* borg versions are actually
> compatible across the network. It's only on the 0.29 boundary that there
> is a problem.
Is this[1] wording acceptable? Then I would prepare it for upload as
0.29
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 01:46:48PM +0100, Danny Edel wrote:
[...]
> Please state whether you think this (write README and hope user actually
> reads it) is an appropriate solution to the compatibility problem,
> meaning we could close the bug this way.
[...]
> [2]:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit
Hello everyone,
after our discussions and the clarifications from anarcat, it seems that
the only sensible way to solve this is by trying to inform the end-user
as much as possible to help her/him make an informed decision whether
they should use the 0.x software or wait for the 1.0 version.
On f
4 matches
Mail list logo
