On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 11:36:18AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-01-02 at 22:22 +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 11:00:44AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2016-01-02 at 21:51 +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 10:38:12AM
On Sat, 2016-01-02 at 22:22 +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 11:00:44AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Sat, 2016-01-02 at 21:51 +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 10:38:12AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 18:53 +1300,
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 11:00:44AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-01-02 at 21:51 +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 10:38:12AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 18:53 +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > > Just a quick note to say that the
On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 09:51:34PM +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 10:38:12AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 18:53 +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > Just a quick note to say that the LDB build failure isn't a
> > > regression
> > > - whatever is go
On Sat, 2016-01-02 at 21:51 +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 10:38:12AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 18:53 +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > Just a quick note to say that the LDB build failure isn't a
> > > regression
> > > - whatever is going on
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 10:38:12AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 18:53 +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > Just a quick note to say that the LDB build failure isn't a
> > regression
> > - whatever is going on here has always been going on, it just wasn't
> > tested before ldb
On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 18:53 +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Just a quick note to say that the LDB build failure isn't a
> regression
> - whatever is going on here has always been going on, it just wasn't
> tested before ldb 1.1.23.
> That said, fixing this is going to require gdb on a s390. Is t
Just a quick note to say that the LDB build failure isn't a regression
- whatever is going on here has always been going on, it just wasn't
tested before ldb 1.1.23.
The commit adding the tests is:
commit 0d36d6d84271f97df82a1f0c9c6c6412833575be
Author: Petr Viktorin
Date: Fri Aug 21 10:22:22
8 matches
Mail list logo