On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 06:54:10PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 06:38:44PM +0100, jhcha54008 wrote:
>
> > I wonder if the following solution would be accepted (see the two patches
> > attached) : let the source package ship the two binaries (bootlx and
> > net_aboot.nh).
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 06:38:44PM +0100, jhcha54008 wrote:
> I wonder if the following solution would be accepted (see the two patches
> attached) : let the source package ship the two binaries (bootlx and
> net_aboot.nh). [...]
Hmm, but this is like removing a hack and creating another one in
Hi,
I wonder if the following solution would be accepted (see the two patches
attached) : let the source package ship the two binaries (bootlx and
net_aboot.nh). One can build aboot-base on amd64 then.
The two binaries are generated from source if the source package is
built on alpha.
(The inspi
3 matches
Mail list logo