On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 01:27 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > You should copy out the test output file so it's possible to see which
> > step of the mqueue5 test failed.
> >
> > There are some recent changes to the mqueue implementation in Linux
> > that
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> You should copy out the test output file so it's possible to see which
> step of the mqueue5 test failed.
>
> There are some recent changes to the mqueue implementation in Linux
> that might possibly have caused this (not because they are known buggy,
>
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 17:23 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have backported the upstream patch for squeeze and it results in the
> attached patch. It does compile and I have not identified any regression
> but the build log mentions unexpected testsuite failures.
>
> Comparing with a
Hello,
I have backported the upstream patch for squeeze and it results in the
attached patch. It does compile and I have not identified any regression
but the build log mentions unexpected testsuite failures.
Comparing with a build of the the previous version, I get only one
supplementary failure
4 matches
Mail list logo
