Thanks, Tobias.
I have finished filing bugs against all packages with reverse
dependencies on jade and sp. All are blockers on the tracking bugs. I
will follow up and/or NMU as necessary.
On 10/16/2016 05:26 AM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> sorry for the late reply... Been busy recenently
Hi Neil,
sorry for the late reply... Been busy recenently.
Am Sonntag, den 25.09.2016, 12:32 -0400 schrieb Neil Roeth:
> Hi, Tobi,
>
> The removal of jade, sp and openjade1.3 is coming
> along. Openjade1.3
> is done, it was actually removed from testing but there were no more
> dependencies on
Hi, Tobi,
The removal of jade, sp and openjade1.3 is coming along. Openjade1.3
is done, it was actually removed from testing but there were no more
dependencies on it. I was focusing recently on the sp binary package,
and most of those dependencies have been switched to opensp. Jade is next.
Hi Neil,
how is the removal going?
I was wondering if there should be a dedicated bug to track the status
of the progess? What do you think?
A "dak rm -Rn jade" yields to:
# Broken Depends:
xmldiff: xmldiff-xmlrev
# Broken Build-Depends:
aboot: sp
alex: jade
datapacker: jade
dejagnu: jade
gn
4 matches
Mail list logo
