Bug#799656: [JsSIP] Re: Bug#799656: NaN 2.x issue

Daniel Pocock writes: > c) maybe we could split the package to have a browser-only version that > doesn't need any of this compiled code? That would be less painful to > support. good idea. -- juha

Bug#799656: [JsSIP] Re: Bug#799656: NaN 2.x issue

2015-09-30 13:48 GMT+02:00 Daniel Pocock : > c) maybe we could split the package to have a browser-only version that > doesn't need any of this compiled code? That would be less painful to > support. d) Just take the dist/jssip.js browser-only version and use just that file for the deb package.

Bug#799656: [JsSIP] Re: Bug#799656: NaN 2.x issue

On 28/09/15 18:18, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > 2015-09-24 15:14 GMT+02:00 Daniel Pocock : >> Can anybody from the JsSIP team comment on this? How do you feel about >> having node-nan 2.x in the dependency hierarchy? Will you continue >> using node-websocket or would you possibly use node-ws[1] in

Bug#799656: [JsSIP] Re: Bug#799656: NaN 2.x issue

2015-09-24 15:14 GMT+02:00 Daniel Pocock : > Can anybody from the JsSIP team comment on this? How do you feel about > having node-nan 2.x in the dependency hierarchy? Will you continue > using node-websocket or would you possibly use node-ws[1] instead? > Using node-ws instead of node-websocket w

Bug#799656: NaN 2.x issue

2015-09-24 16:15 GMT+02:00 Daniel Pocock : > > > On 24/09/15 15:16, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > > > > > 2015-09-24 14:59 GMT+02:00 Daniel Pocock > >: > > > > > > > > On 24/09/15 14:53, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > > 2015-09-24 14:42 GMT+02:00 Daniel Pocock

Bug#799656: NaN 2.x issue

On 24/09/15 15:16, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > > 2015-09-24 14:59 GMT+02:00 Daniel Pocock >: > > > > On 24/09/15 14:53, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > 2015-09-24 14:42 GMT+02:00 Daniel Pocock > >

Bug#799656: NaN 2.x issue

On 24/09/15 14:58, Jérémy Lal wrote: > 2015-09-24 14:53 GMT+02:00 Jérémy Lal >: > > 2015-09-24 14:42 GMT+02:00 Daniel Pocock >: > > > > This is failing because node-nan 2.x is now in unstable > > I've filed a bug u

Bug#799656: NaN 2.x issue

2015-09-24 14:59 GMT+02:00 Daniel Pocock : > > > On 24/09/15 14:53, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > 2015-09-24 14:42 GMT+02:00 Daniel Pocock > >: > > > > > > > > This is failing because node-nan 2.x is now in unstable > > > > I've filed a bug upstream requesting support fo

Bug#799656: NaN 2.x issue

On 24/09/15 14:53, Jérémy Lal wrote: > 2015-09-24 14:42 GMT+02:00 Daniel Pocock >: > > > > This is failing because node-nan 2.x is now in unstable > > I've filed a bug upstream requesting support for node-nan 2.x > > > This is the right thing to do. > >

Bug#799656: NaN 2.x issue

2015-09-24 14:53 GMT+02:00 Jérémy Lal : > 2015-09-24 14:42 GMT+02:00 Daniel Pocock : > >> >> >> This is failing because node-nan 2.x is now in unstable >> >> I've filed a bug upstream requesting support for node-nan 2.x >> > > This is the right thing to do. > > >> Maybe both old and new versions o

Bug#799656: NaN 2.x issue

2015-09-24 14:42 GMT+02:00 Daniel Pocock : > > > This is failing because node-nan 2.x is now in unstable > > I've filed a bug upstream requesting support for node-nan 2.x > This is the right thing to do. > Maybe both old and new versions of node-nan will be needed in stretch? > This isn't ! Th

Bug#799656: NaN 2.x issue

This is failing because node-nan 2.x is now in unstable I've filed a bug upstream requesting support for node-nan 2.x Maybe both old and new versions of node-nan will be needed in stretch? https://packages.qa.debian.org/n/node-nan.html