Let's give the upstream authors 1-2 days to respond.
Tomasz
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #793010 [pax-utils] pax-utils: FTBFS on mipsel: FAIL: lddtree.py.list
Added tag(s) patch.
--
793010: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793010
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Control: tags -1 patch
On 28 July 2015 at 13:14, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> I'm not sure there is such a thing, but the upstream authors have been
> very reponsive. Btw, I may have found the problem, I attach a patch,
> which has been sent to upstream authors. It passes all tests, but may
> break so
On 28/07/15 11:53, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> On 27 July 2015 at 16:44, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> > On 24/07/15 14:49, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> * you should confirm that python-pyelftools ignore dynamic linker
> >> configuration (I suspect this is true); it would be goo
On 27 July 2015 at 16:44, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> On 24/07/15 14:49, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> * you should confirm that python-pyelftools ignore dynamic linker
>> configuration (I suspect this is true); it would be good to
>> extract a minimal Python program using pyelftools
On 24/07/15 14:49, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> [...]
>
> * you should confirm that python-pyelftools ignore dynamic linker
> configuration (I suspect this is true); it would be good to
> extract a minimal Python program using pyelftools that shows this
>
I take it back, maybe pyelftools do n
On 23/07/15 20:07, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> On 20 July 2015 at 15:08, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> >
> > Well, upstream is already working on this. In fact, the test above
> > passes in the new version (which I've just pushed to collab-maint),
> > but the next one fails. You may try to pinpoint
On 20 July 2015 at 15:08, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
>
> Well, upstream is already working on this. In fact, the test above
> passes in the new version (which I've just pushed to collab-maint),
> but the next one fails. You may try to pinpoint the problem, but it is
> very likely the fact that python-p
On 20/07/15 14:44, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> Package: pax-utils
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> as you can see at buildd [0], pax-utils FTBFS on mipsel.
>
> The final part of the log is:
>
> [...]
>
Package: pax-utils
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Dear maintainer,
as you can see at buildd [0], pax-utils FTBFS on mipsel.
The final part of the log is:
[...]
../dotest.cmp
FAIL: lddtree.py.list
--- lddtree.py.list 2015-07-1
10 matches
Mail list logo
