Bug#791173: libstxxl: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-23 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 23-08-15 19:59, Anton Gladky wrote: > Thanks, Bas. Agreed and accepted. Will upload in a > few moments. Thanks. I'll finish up the new osrm revision to close its RC bug after libstxxl hits the mirrors. > Feel free to join debian-science group on Alioth, I will > accept your request, if you wan

Bug#791173: libstxxl: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-23 Thread Anton Gladky
Thanks, Bas. Agreed and accepted. Will upload in a few moments. Feel free to join debian-science group on Alioth, I will accept your request, if you want. Best regards Anton 2015-08-23 19:34 GMT+02:00 Sebastiaan Couwenberg : > My proposed changes are attached because cannot push to debian-scie

Bug#791173: libstxxl: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-23 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 23-08-15 19:15, Simon McVittie wrote: > On 23/08/15 16:10, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 23-08-15 16:59, Simon McVittie wrote: >>> The "SONAME bump" option was only really meant to be taken if the library >>> had an upstream SONAME bump pending anyway (for instance icu and boost >>> went th

Bug#791173: libstxxl: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-23 Thread Simon McVittie
On 23/08/15 16:10, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 23-08-15 16:59, Simon McVittie wrote: >> The "SONAME bump" option was only really meant to be taken if the library >> had an upstream SONAME bump pending anyway (for instance icu and boost >> went this route). If there is not a SONAME change alre

Processed: Re: Bug#791173: libstxxl: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 791173 +pending Bug #791173 [src:libstxxl] libstxxl: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 791173: http://bugs.debia

Bug#791173: libstxxl: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-23 Thread Anton Gladky
tags 791173 +pending thanks Hi Sebastiaan thanks for you effort, but I have just pushed it already. Thanks Anton 2015-08-23 17:10 GMT+02:00 Sebastiaan Couwenberg : > On 23-08-15 16:59, Simon McVittie wrote: >> The "SONAME bump" option was only really meant to be taken if the library >> had an

Bug#791173: libstxxl: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-23 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 23-08-15 16:59, Simon McVittie wrote: > The "SONAME bump" option was only really meant to be taken if the library > had an upstream SONAME bump pending anyway (for instance icu and boost > went this route). If there is not a SONAME change already in the pipeline, > you should do the "v5" rename

Bug#791173: libstxxl: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-23 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 at 18:57:37 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > It looks like libstxxl needs a transition after al. > > At least osrm is a reverse dependency, it cannot be built due to > undefined references to stxxl::print_msg() and others. Indeed. When I closed the bug with "no rdeps, don