Hey!
On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 21:33:54 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Thanks for explaining this.
No problem. :)
> On 27/08/14 20:40, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I see you've dealt with this now. Regardless, I think this was the
> > correct “fix”, even if usually not kosher, the freebsd-glue stuff
Hi Guillem,
Thanks for explaining this.
On 27/08/14 20:40, Guillem Jover wrote:
> I see you've dealt with this now. Regardless, I think this was the
> correct “fix”, even if usually not kosher, the freebsd-glue stuff
> pulls in libbsd anyway so it's kind of part of its API/ABI.
Just one other th
Hi!
On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 20:03:46 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 25/08/14 19:07, Christoph Egger wrote:
> > Indeed it works! And I'm running that 10.1 kernel just right now! As
> > soon as some solution is committed I can upload it to experimental (or
> > should I just go ahead and patch -
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Sorry, I forgot -- normally there should be an ABI bump when symbols are
> removed (leading to a round of binNMUs). But I've checked that none of
> the reverse deps need this:
Good catch totally forgot about that as well.
FWIW we need a fixed clang or so before
Sorry, I forgot -- normally there should be an ABI bump when symbols are
removed (leading to a round of binNMUs). But I've checked that none of
the reverse deps need this:
* kfreebsd-10 only looks at the header definitions AFAICT, certainly
the kernel isn't linking against userland libs...
*
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> I've staged in trunk/freebsd-glue r5500 the changes I think are
> necessary for this.
Seems the definitions still were around? I've commited a fix for that
just now -- please shout if you think I got this wrong!
Christoph
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-
On 25/08/14 21:30, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Seems the definitions still were around? I've commited a fix for that
> just now -- please shout if you think I got this wrong!
Oops sorry, yes that was the first and most important part of this.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
sig
I've staged in trunk/freebsd-glue r5500 the changes I think are
necessary for this.
It seems OK to me since freebsd-glue has libbsd-dev as an install-time
dependency. I've bumped the version of that to make sure that it will
be 0.7.0 or later, having funopen etc.
What remained was to check rever
On 25/08/14 19:07, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Indeed it works! And I'm running that 10.1 kernel just right now! As
> soon as some solution is committed I can upload it to experimental (or
> should I just go ahead and patch -glue?)
I just confirmed the freebsd-glue problem happens building kfreebsd-1
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Please try the attached to patch your /usr/include/freebsd/stdio.h
Indeed it works! And I'm running that 10.1 kernel just right now! As
soon as some solution is committed I can upload it to experimental (or
should I just go ahead and patch -glue?)
Christoph
10 matches
Mail list logo
