On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 22:17:05 -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> >> Thanks for digging into this. I suggest we move forward with pulling
> >> out the MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME mechanism and do some testing. I can work on
> >> that.
> > Sounds good, thank you!
> Okay, so it's no worse with all of the xulrunner
On 06/15/2014 07:36 AM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 09:13:58 -0700, tony mancill wrote:
>
>>> My tentative conclusion is that MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME was needed at some
>>> time in the past, doesn't get set since ages, which doesn't cause any
>>> visible problems.
>>>
>>> So it seems li
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 09:13:58 -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > My tentative conclusion is that MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME was needed at some
> > time in the past, doesn't get set since ages, which doesn't cause any
> > visible problems.
> >
> > So it seems like we can just drop this whole xulrunner/iceweasel
On 06/14/2014 04:52 AM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 12:04:00 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>
>> Your package depends on:
>> xulrunner-29 | xulrunner-24.0 | xulrunner-17.0 | xulrunner-10.0 |
>> xulrunner-1.9.1
>>
>> But iceweasel no longer provides a xulrunner binary. Note
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 12:04:00 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Your package depends on:
> xulrunner-29 | xulrunner-24.0 | xulrunner-17.0 | xulrunner-10.0 |
> xulrunner-1.9.1
>
> But iceweasel no longer provides a xulrunner binary. Note that the iceweasel
> binary
> itself ships libxul.so n
Source: tuxguitar
Version: 1.2-19
Severity: serious
Your package depends on:
xulrunner-29 | xulrunner-24.0 | xulrunner-17.0 | xulrunner-10.0 |
xulrunner-1.9.1
But iceweasel no longer provides a xulrunner binary. Note that the iceweasel
binary
itself ships libxul.so now, so perhaps adding icewea
6 matches
Mail list logo
