On 02/06/14 14:13, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
You'd find that the default configuration is unusable under non-GNOME
(and thus now for all hurd and kfreebsd users).
We can't ship unusable software in Jessie. As per -release mandate kfreebsd-*
is no exception anymore.
It's already been stablished
Andreas,
Seems I need to rephrase. The kfreebsd-specific problem has been
addressed. Any other problem with gnome-terminal, I don't have
patience/motivation to pursue right now, due in part to:
Point 1:
On 02/06/14 13:13, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 12:50:06PM +0100, St
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 12:50:06PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
[... random ramblings removed ...]
> I'm assuming gnome-terminal will still run okay, or otherwise some
> Linux user can follow up on this.
[...]
Please stop making assuptions.
Instead, again, please take 2 seconds to try to look
On 15:43, Robert Millan wrote:
> I find it very strange that a terminal application needs gnome-shell. There
> are
> dozens of terminal applications, and so far they seem to manage without
> dragging
> their own desktop environment of choice with them.
FWIW I just noticed there isn't an install-
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 18:50:22 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On 31/05/14 18:40, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >IMVHO -release@ doesn't need to know about what happens to every single
> >package. Feel free to keep that kind of Q & A between maintainers and
> >porters.
>
> I was under the impression t
On 31/05/14 18:22, Pino Toscano wrote:
Attached a first version of patch for it; the changes to control.in
and rules should be fine, while most probably the .install files
could need few tricks (since gnome-terminal-search-provider.ini is
not installed). GNOME team: if you could help on this, tha
On 31/05/14 18:40, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
IMVHO -release@ doesn't need to know about what happens to every single
package. Feel free to keep that kind of Q & A between maintainers and
porters.
I was under the impression that -release was overseeing the QA requirements
for Jessie are being satis
Robert Millan (2014-05-31):
> I find it very strange that a terminal application needs gnome-shell. There
> are
> dozens of terminal applications, and so far they seem to manage without
> dragging
> their own desktop environment of choice with them.
>
> Which makes me wonder: Does gnome-termina
tag 749888 + patch
thanks
Hi,
On 2014-05-31 15:43, Robert Millan wrote:
Which makes me wonder: Does gnome-terminal actually work without
gnome-shell?
It seems (just looking at the sources, I'm not a GNOME guy)
gnome-shell is needed to integrate gnome-terminal as search provider
for gnome-shel
Please accept my apologies. Apparently my previous mail wasn't clear enough for
everyone. So please allow me to ellaborate: The text had a statement and some
questions. One can tell them appart because questions end with a '?' sign, and
statements don't. The questions are what I'd really like to
On 31/05/14 17:51, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
Maybe you should try to spend 2 seconds on trying to figure it out
(ie. by searching the package changelog) before posting in the future.
Why?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
Hello Robert Millan!
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 03:43:18PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I find it very strange that a terminal application needs gnome-shell.
[...]
Maybe you should try to spend 2 seconds on trying to figure it out
(ie. by searching the package changelog) before posting
On 15:43, Robert Millan wrote:
> I find it very strange that a terminal application needs gnome-shell.
Stranger still that it is a *build* dependency; here's what happens
without it:
> checking whether to build the gnome-shell search provider... yes
> checking for
> /usr/share/dbus-1/interfaces
Hi,
I find it very strange that a terminal application needs gnome-shell. There are
dozens of terminal applications, and so far they seem to manage without dragging
their own desktop environment of choice with them.
Which makes me wonder: Does gnome-terminal actually work without gnome-shell? I
Package: gnome-terminal
Version: 3.12.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Dear Maintainer,
Hello,
kfreebsd-any and hurd-any have been removed from the gnome-shell
archs. gnome-terminal thus needs to make the dependency on gnome-shell
[!kfreebsd-any !hurd-any] to be buildable again there.
15 matches
Mail list logo
