Bug#749718: FTBFS on s390x

2014-05-31 Thread Norbert Preining
> Argg, indeed, there is one place left ... in the libpaper code. I uploaded a new texlive-base that *disables* the luajittex format completely. It is too much pain to support an experimental format that is not necessary, since there is the normal luatex format. Those who *want* to play around c

Bug#749718: FTBFS on s390x

2014-05-30 Thread Norbert Preining
On Fri, 30 May 2014, John David Anglin wrote: > /usr/bin/tl-paper: setting paper size for xdvi to letter. > /usr/bin/tl-paper: setting paper size for pdftex to letter. > Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done. > Building format(s) --all. Argg, indeed, there is one place left ... in the

Bug#749718: FTBFS on s390x

2014-05-30 Thread John David Anglin
On 30-May-14, at 7:39 PM, Norbert Preining wrote: On Fri, 30 May 2014, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Thanks! It has been built on s390x, but I'm seeing some problems when texlive is installed, e.g.: Did you use the package I uploaded? It requires tex-common >= 5.02 and tex-common 5.

Bug#749718: FTBFS on s390x

2014-05-30 Thread Norbert Preining
On Fri, 30 May 2014, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Thanks! It has been built on s390x, but I'm seeing some problems when texlive > is > installed, e.g.: Did you use the package I uploaded? It requires tex-common >= 5.02 and tex-common 5.02 fixes this problem, hopefully! Norbert -

Bug#749718: FTBFS on s390x

2014-05-30 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 31/05/14 01:03, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 30/05/14 16:08, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 30/05/14 14:39, Hilmar Preusse wrote: >>> On 30.05.14 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (po...@debian.org) wrote: >>> >>> Hil >>> Thanks! It has been built on s390x, but I'm seeing some problems when

Bug#749718: FTBFS on s390x

2014-05-30 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 30/05/14 16:08, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 30/05/14 14:39, Hilmar Preusse wrote: >> On 30.05.14 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (po...@debian.org) wrote: >> >> Hil >> >>> Thanks! It has been built on s390x, but I'm seeing some problems when >>> texlive is >>> installed, e.g.: >>> >>> https://bui

Bug#749718: FTBFS on s390x

2014-05-30 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 30/05/14 14:39, Hilmar Preusse wrote: > On 30.05.14 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (po...@debian.org) wrote: > > Hil > >> Thanks! It has been built on s390x, but I'm seeing some problems when >> texlive is >> installed, e.g.: >> >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=s3ql&arch=s390x&ver=2.

Bug#749718: FTBFS on s390x

2014-05-30 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 30.05.14 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (po...@debian.org) wrote: Hil > Thanks! It has been built on s390x, but I'm seeing some problems when texlive > is > installed, e.g.: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=s3ql&arch=s390x&ver=2.8.1%2Bdfsg-1%2Bb1&stamp=1401449820 > Building format

Bug#749718: FTBFS on s390x

2014-05-30 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 30/05/14 05:08, Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I committed this patch to the git repository: > diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules > index 76e6101..3f2f36b 100755 > --- a/debian/rules > +++ b/debian/rules > @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ > export SHELL=/bin/bash > export CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/s

Bug#749718: FTBFS on s390x (and others)

2014-05-30 Thread Adam Conrad
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:15:59PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > > Ubuntu tried on arm64[1] and ppc64el[2], and the Debian tried on > > ppc64[3], all failed the same way as the s390x and hppa failures: Also, I cherry-picked your git commit, and it doesn't actually work as advertised. See below

Bug#749718: FTBFS on s390x (and others)

2014-05-30 Thread Norbert Preining
On Fri, 30 May 2014, Adam Conrad wrote: > Also, I cherry-picked your git commit, and it doesn't actually work > as advertised. See below: Yes, fixed already .. I am building with this now .. .. LUAJIT_FAIL_ARCHS := s390x hppa arm64 ppc64 ppc64el ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH), $(LUAJIT_FAIL_AR

Bug#749718: FTBFS on s390x (and others)

2014-05-30 Thread Norbert Preining
> Ubuntu tried on arm64[1] and ppc64el[2], and the Debian tried on > ppc64[3], all failed the same way as the s390x and hppa failures: Ahh, Ubuntu, did see build stats there. Thanks. Norbert PREINING, Norbert

Bug#749718: FTBFS on s390x (and others)

2014-05-30 Thread Adam Conrad
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:10:00PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > On Fri, 30 May 2014, Adam Conrad wrote: > > > +LUAJIT_FAIL_ARCHS="s390x hppa" > > > > > > Looks like this should also include ppc64 and ppc64el, at least. > > > > And also arm64 ... > > Ahh, but for all of them the build succeed

Bug#749718: FTBFS on s390x (and others)

2014-05-30 Thread Norbert Preining
On Fri, 30 May 2014, Adam Conrad wrote: > armel and armhf should be fine, yes. Though, as noted earlier in the Thanks. > bug, it's pretty poor form to use embedded libraries (and runtimes!) I know, but there are many more embedded libs (png, gd, ...) - this is all due to the libpng maintainers

Bug#749718: FTBFS on s390x (and others)

2014-05-30 Thread Norbert Preining
On Fri, 30 May 2014, Adam Conrad wrote: > > +LUAJIT_FAIL_ARCHS="s390x hppa" > > > > Looks like this should also include ppc64 and ppc64el, at least. > > And also arm64 ... Ahh, but for all of them the build succeed, right? We have already tests in TeX Live source code and automatically disable

Bug#749718: FTBFS on s390x (and others)

2014-05-30 Thread Adam Conrad
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:07:27PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > On Fri, 30 May 2014, Adam Conrad wrote: > > > Looks like this should also include ppc64 and ppc64el, at least. > > > > And also arm64 ... > > Hmmm, armel and armhf are fine? armel and armhf should be fine, yes. Though, as noted

Bug#749718: FTBFS on s390x (and others)

2014-05-30 Thread Norbert Preining
On Fri, 30 May 2014, Adam Conrad wrote: > > Looks like this should also include ppc64 and ppc64el, at least. > > And also arm64 ... Hmmm, armel and armhf are fine? Maybe I turn it upsidedown ;-) Norbert PREINING, Norbert

Bug#749718: FTBFS on s390x (and others)

2014-05-30 Thread Adam Conrad
> +LUAJIT_FAIL_ARCHS="s390x hppa" > > Looks like this should also include ppc64 and ppc64el, at least. And also arm64 ... ... Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#749718: FTBFS on s390x

2014-05-29 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi everyone, I committed this patch to the git repository: diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index 76e6101..3f2f36b 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ export SHELL=/bin/bash export CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/sh +LUAJIT_FAIL_ARCHS="s390x hppa" + # In case one wants to b

Processed: Re: Bug#749718: FTBFS on s390x

2014-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 patch Bug #749718 [texlive-bin] FTBFS on s390x Added tag(s) patch. -- 749718: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749718 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@

Bug#749718: FTBFS on s390x

2014-05-29 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Control: tag -1 patch Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2014-05-29): > Package: texlive-bin > Version: 2014.20140528.34243-1 > Severity: serious > Control: block 746709 by -1 > > Dear maintainer, > > Your package failed to build on s390x. That is making some packages not > installable, which is blocking

Bug#749718: FTBFS on s390x

2014-05-29 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Package: textlive-bin Version: 2014.20140528.34243-1 Severity: serious Control: block 746709 by -1 Dear maintainer, Your package failed to build on s390x. That is making some packages not installable, which is blocking some binNMUs for the python3 transition. Log at https://buildd.debian.org/st