Hey Michael,
Michael Biebl [2015-01-07 13:17 +0100]:
> Updated patch attached (tested with a split-usr setup and with both
> initramfs-tools 0.116 and 0.118)
Looks great to me, thanks! Will you commit yourself? (I figure there's
no point trying to send that upstream, even with #ifdef HAVE_SPLIT_U
control: tags -1 + patch
Am 06.01.2015 um 10:37 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 06.01.2015 um 08:23 schrieb Martin Pitt:
>> Also, I think there is a simpler way to check if a dir is a
>> mountpoint: s1 = stat(dir), s2 = stat(parent(dir))
>> (i. e. dir + "/.."), and check
>>
>> is_mount = (st.st_dev !
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #742048 [systemd] systemd-remount-fs.service fails for split-usr
Bug #763327 [systemd] [systemd] FAILED to remount /
Added tag(s) patch.
Added tag(s) patch.
--
742048: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742048
763327: http://bugs.d
Hi Martin,
thanks for the review!
Am 06.01.2015 um 08:23 schrieb Martin Pitt:
> Michael Biebl [2015-01-06 1:34 +0100]:
>> +static bool is_mounted(const char *dev_path) {
>> +_cleanup_endmntent_ FILE *mtab = NULL;
>> +struct mntent *me = NULL;
>> +
>> +mtab = setmntent("/e
Hey Michael,
thanks for dealing with this!
Michael Biebl [2015-01-06 1:34 +0100]:
> +static bool is_mounted(const char *dev_path) {
> +_cleanup_endmntent_ FILE *mtab = NULL;
> +struct mntent *me = NULL;
> +
> +mtab = setmntent("/etc/mtab", "r");
Can we rely on /etc/mtab
Am 27.12.2014 um 11:20 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 27. Dezember 2014 09:33:21 MEZ, schrieb Sven Joachim :
>> I haven't looked at dracut, but with initramfs-tools 0.118 /usr is
>> going
>> to end up being mounted readonly.
>
> Hmm, good point. We'll need a more elaborate patch then which deals wit
Am 27. Dezember 2014 09:33:21 MEZ, schrieb Sven Joachim :
>On 2014-12-27 02:44 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> It looks like we won't get initramfs-tools 0.118 with usr-mount
>support
>> in the initramfs, as this created quite a few regressions which need
>to
>> be dealt with first.
>>
>> I ther
On 2014-12-27 02:44 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> It looks like we won't get initramfs-tools 0.118 with usr-mount support
> in the initramfs, as this created quite a few regressions which need to
> be dealt with first.
>
> I therefore think we need to workaround this issue in systemd and make
> su
Am 27.12.2014 um 02:44 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> It looks like we won't get initramfs-tools 0.118 with usr-mount support
> in the initramfs, as this created quite a few regressions which need to
> be dealt with first.
... for jessie, I meant to say.
>
> I therefore think we need to workaround thi
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #742048 [systemd] systemd-remount-fs.service fails for split-usr
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
--
742048: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742048
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: severity -1 normal
thanks
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 08:27:41PM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
>
> Hi Michael, hi dear systemd maintainers,
>
> Le mardi, 18 mars 2014, 17.11:37 Michael Biebl a écrit :
> > I've setup a jessie test VM with a LVM/split-partition configuration,
> > i.e. a
Processing control commands:
> found -1 215-3
Bug #742048 [systemd] systemd-remount-fs.service fails for split-usr
Marked as found in versions systemd/215-3.
> severity -1 serious
Bug #742048 [systemd] systemd-remount-fs.service fails for split-usr
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
--
7420
12 matches
Mail list logo
