Bug#739164: arora: Should probably be removed from the archive, like rekonq

Hi Sune, hi Salvo On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 02:56:10PM +0100, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: > reopen 739164 > thanks > > > I have no plans to remove Arora from the archive. > > The bug is directed more at the security team than at you, please let one of > them respond before taking any action on this.

Processed: Re: Bug#739164: arora: Should probably be removed from the archive, like rekonq

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 739164 Bug #739164 {Done: Sune Vuorela } [arora] arora: Should probably be removed from the archive, like rekonq Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #739164 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping proc

Bug#739164: arora: Should probably be removed from the archive, like rekonq

reopen 739164 thanks > I have no plans to remove Arora from the archive. The bug is directed more at the security team than at you, please let one of them respond before taking any action on this. By common logic if QtWebkit is a security risk and rekonq had to be removed, it is possible that

Bug#739164: arora: Should probably be removed from the archive, like rekonq

Package: arora Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Dear Maintainer, I've noticed that rekonq was removed from the archive because of security problems with QtWebkit. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=712808 Arora depends on the same library, so coul