On 12 May 2016 at 19:47, Fernando Seiti Furusato wrote:
> Actually, this works, not replacing build-deps, but adding
> libiberty-dev in addition to binutils-dev.
Thanks, uploading fixed version.
> With that and adding -I/usr/include/libiberty as suggested by
> YunQiang Su, the package built in a
Hello.
Actually, this works, not replacing build-deps, but adding
libiberty-dev in addition to binutils-dev.
With that and adding -I/usr/include/libiberty as suggested by
YunQiang Su, the package built in a clean chroot (using sbuild).
I produced a debdiff which does the aforementioned, attached
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 14:59:53 +0300 Riku Voipio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > The libiberty.h is provided by libiberty-dev and installed in
> > /usr/include/libiberty/libiberty.h.
>
> unfortunately this change isn't enough. Due to some other changes,
> linking against static libbfd doesn't work:
>
> gcc -std=g
Hi,
> The libiberty.h is provided by libiberty-dev and installed in
> /usr/include/libiberty/libiberty.h.
unfortunately this change isn't enough. Due to some other changes,
linking against static libbfd doesn't work:
gcc -std=gnu99 -shared -fPIC
.libs/libmutrace_backtrace_symbols_la-backtrac
Same problem happens on hppa architecture.
Full build log is here:
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mutrace&arch=hppa&ver=0.2.0-2&stamp=1394830489
CC libmutrace_backtrace_symbols_la-backtrace-symbols.lo
backtrace-symbols.c:53:23: fatal error: libiberty.h: No such file o
Source: mutrace
Version: 0.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131128 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Due to the switch of libiberty to his own pa
6 matches
Mail list logo
