Bug#722035: switch from ffgtk to roger

2014-03-04 Thread Rolf Leggewie
> Roger Router has been finalized and I'm not waiting for sponsorship so s/not/now/ On 04.03.2014 18:08, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > fwiw, I'm personally not interested in sponsoring anything that > doesn't give users a (best effort?) upgrade path. I wasn't aware you're actually in a position to

Bug#722035: switch from ffgtk to roger

2014-03-04 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello Rolf! Thanks for working on ffgtk/roger! On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 05:33:00PM +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote: > On 04.03.2014 17:17, Rolf Leggewie wrote: > > the successor to ffgtk is called Roger Router. > > Well, I forgot to mention the most important bit; the packaging for > Roger Router has

Bug#722035: switch from ffgtk to roger

2014-03-04 Thread Rolf Leggewie
On 04.03.2014 17:17, Rolf Leggewie wrote: > the successor to ffgtk is called Roger Router. Well, I forgot to mention the most important bit; the packaging for Roger Router has been finalized and I'm not waiting for sponsorship so that the new package can land in NEW. https://mentors.debian.net/pa

Bug#722035: switch from ffgtk to roger

2014-03-04 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Hello Andreas, the successor to ffgtk is called Roger Router. Upstream is the same but treats the two projects as completely separate so there is no "upgrade path" as such. Configuration is fairly simple, though, so I don't see much of a problem here. And apparently configuration stored on the