Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch
Bug #711071 [src:bitlbee] bitlbee: please port to libotr5-dev
Added tag(s) patch.
--
711071: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=711071
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
Control: tag -1 patch
intrigeri (2013-09-17):
> Cyril Brulebois wrote (17 Sep 2013 18:14:34 GMT) :
> > Do you have a patch handy, or should I take care of that now?
>
> I don't, feel free to take care of that :)
There you go. I don't mind somebody else's uploading it, was just
looking quickly a
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois wrote (17 Sep 2013 18:14:34 GMT) :
> looks good to me (that's at least what came to mind while reading the
> beginning of the thread).
Thanks.
> Do you have a patch handy, or should I take care of that now?
I don't, feel free to take care of that :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Hi,
intrigeri (2013-09-17):
> Would you mind a NMU that disables building of bitlbee-plugin-otr in
> debian/control, drops the build-dep on libotr2-dev, comments out
> everything related to otr in debian/rules, and disables building of
> the OTR stuff at configure time? (+ everything I'm missing)
Hi,
Wilmer van der Gaast wrote (17 Sep 2013 13:33:53 GMT) :
> Argh! I had no idea this was blocking other packages, sorry. :-( Well
> it'd be easy to just omit the bitlbee-plugin-otr package from Debian for
> now while this is getting resolved.
> Although omitting a single binary package is proba
intrigeri (intrig...@debian.org) wrote:
>
> If nothing has happened on this front, I'm afraid the OTR support in
> BitlBee should now be considered as not maintained.
>
There's a fix actually, I've just not managed to take a closer look at
it, plus ther was some comment that it might not be compl
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (30 Jul 2013 07:47:05 GMT) :
> Wilmer van der Gaast wrote (06 Jul 2013 16:05:27 GMT) :
>> Just had a response from him on Twitter now, might get a fix over the
>> next weeks.
> Any news on this front?
If nothing has happened on this front, I'm afraid the OTR support in
BitlBe
Hi,
Wilmer van der Gaast wrote (06 Jul 2013 16:05:27 GMT) :
> Just had a response from him on Twitter now, might get a fix over the
> next weeks.
Any news on this front?
(I'd like to stress out, since it may not be obvious to everyone
involved here, that libotr4 and later prevents protocol downg
Just had a response from him on Twitter now, might get a fix over the
next weeks.
Wilmer v/d Gaast.
--
+ .''`. - -- ---+ +- -- --- - --+
| wilmer : :' : gaast.net | | OSS Programmer www.bitlbee.org |
| lintux `. `~' debian.org | | Full-time geek wilmer.
On 06-07-13 16:35, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 14:47 +0200, julien.cris...@logilab.fr wrote:
>> your package build-depends on libotr2-dev, which is no longer built
>> in sid as it has been replaced by libotr5-dev. Please port your
>> package to the new library.
>
> Any news?
>
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 14:47 +0200, julien.cris...@logilab.fr wrote:
> your package build-depends on libotr2-dev, which is no longer built
> in sid as it has been replaced by libotr5-dev. Please port your
> package to the new library.
Any news?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
Source: bitlbee
Version: 3.2-1.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package build-depends on libotr2-dev, which is no longer built
in sid as it has been replaced by libotr5-dev. Please port your
package to the new library.
Thanks, Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debia
12 matches
Mail list logo
