Hi,
I talked to Davide and he is saying he still supports xmail. Let's
update it. Can you NMU this version since you worked so hard?
-R.
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> Hi Radu,
>
> Radu Spineanu writes:
>
>> Sent a ping to Davide, no answer yet. Let's wait for an answ
Hi Radu,
Radu Spineanu writes:
> Sent a ping to Davide, no answer yet. Let's wait for an answer for a
> couple more days.
>
any update on this yet?.. is it worth to have the package still in
Debian? actually this nmu is blocking one of NM process task so :)
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.
Sent a ping to Davide, no answer yet. Let's wait for an answer for a
couple more days.
-R.
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 2:35 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi Radu,
>
> Radu Spineanu wrote (16 Oct 2013 17:17:54 GMT) :
>> That is a good question. There hasn't been a new version of xmail
>> since around my last
Hi Radu,
Radu Spineanu wrote (16 Oct 2013 17:17:54 GMT) :
> That is a good question. There hasn't been a new version of xmail
> since around my last upload. At the time Davide planned IMAP support
> but I don't believe that's going to happen anymore.
> I'll send an email to the creator of XMail t
Hi Vasudev,
Vasudev Kamath wrote (01 Nov 2013 16:24:11 GMT) :
> Yeah I actually read it in a wrong way, here is fixed patch
It now looks good to me.
Regards,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardn
On 11:21 Sat 19 Oct , intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Vasudev Kamath wrote (19 Oct 2013 05:59:12 GMT) :
> >> It seems to me that the attached patch symlinks
> >> /usr/share/xmail/sample to /usr/share/doc/xmail/sample (while it
> >> should do the contrary, right?) and does not move
> >> /usr/share/d
Vasudev Kamath wrote (26 Oct 2013 15:08:39 GMT) :
> On 11:21 Sat 19 Oct , intrigeri wrote:
>> > So did I do something wrong in understanding above?
>>
>> I believe you did it the wrong way.
FTR, we've just clarified this on IRC, Vasudev understood his mistake,
and will refresh the patch :)
On 11:21 Sat 19 Oct , intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Vasudev Kamath wrote (19 Oct 2013 05:59:12 GMT) :
> >> It seems to me that the attached patch symlinks
> >> /usr/share/xmail/sample to /usr/share/doc/xmail/sample (while it
> >> should do the contrary, right?) and does not move
> >> /usr/share/d
Hi,
Vasudev Kamath wrote (19 Oct 2013 05:59:12 GMT) :
>> It seems to me that the attached patch symlinks
>> /usr/share/xmail/sample to /usr/share/doc/xmail/sample (while it
>> should do the contrary, right?) and does not move
>> /usr/share/doc/xmail/sample to /usr/share/xmail/sample.
> Regarding
On 10:33 Wed 16 Oct , intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Vasudev Kamath wrote (22 Sep 2013 07:52:26 GMT) :
> > I went through the log and prepared an NMU for fixing the policy issue,
> > as mentioned in Debian policy document I symlinked the sample folder
> > under /usr/share/doc/xmail to /usr/share/x
That is a good question. There hasn't been a new version of xmail
since around my last upload. At the time Davide planned IMAP support
but I don't believe that's going to happen anymore.
I'll send an email to the creator of XMail to see what his plans are.
If he doesn't want to continue working on
Hi,
Vasudev Kamath wrote (22 Sep 2013 07:52:26 GMT) :
> I went through the log and prepared an NMU for fixing the policy issue,
> as mentioned in Debian policy document I symlinked the sample folder
> under /usr/share/doc/xmail to /usr/share/xmail and in the maint script
> replaced the path to use
Control: tag -1 +patch
Hi Andreas,
I went through the log and prepared an NMU for fixing the policy issue,
as mentioned in Debian policy document I symlinked the sample folder
under /usr/share/doc/xmail to /usr/share/xmail and in the maint script
replaced the path to use /usr/share/xmail instead.
13 matches
Mail list logo
