Hello,
Mathieu Lirzin writes:
> Yuan-Chen Cheng writes:
>
>> Shall we just remove those two file from the install list and live
>> with that ?
>>
>> I am interested to provide patch to do that if that’s the possible and
>> legal way to do.
[...]
> IIUC correctly the issue is that the license no
Yuan-Chen Cheng writes:
> Hi, I write a email to bug-jwh...@gnu.org last week but get no reply.
>
> Shall we just remove those two file from the install list and live
> with that ?
>
> I am interested to provide patch to do that if that’s the possible and
> legal way to do.
>
> thanks, YC
>
Hell
Hi, I write a email to bug-jwh...@gnu.org last week but get no reply.
Shall we just remove those two file from the install list and live with that ?
I am interested to provide patch to do that if that’s the possible and legal
way to do.
thanks, YC
The copyright holder of jwhois is the FSF. I don't know what their policy
on re-licensing is though I guess it's not the first Debian bug to
encounter this :-)
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:22 PM, bastien ROUCARIES <
roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Package: jwhois
> Severity: serious
> user: d
Package: jwhois
Severity: serious
user: debian...@lists.debian.org
usertags: gfdl-invariant
The folowing file (manually checked) are non free with invariant version.
doc/jwhois.texi
doc/jwhois.info
Could you please check if upstream is willing to relicense.
Bastien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
5 matches
Mail list logo
