On 02/02/2013 01:30 AM, Scott Howard
wrote:
retitle 699351 linux-igd follows old UPnP IGD V1 spec
thanks
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:32 AM, VALETTE Eric OLNC/OLPS
wrote:
Look at the CVE that have been filled regarding libupnp6 and the associated
bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 699351 linux-igd follows old UPnP IGD V1 spec
Bug #699351 [linux-igd] linux-igd is obsolete, use a very old libpunnp version
subject to numerous security bug
Changed Bug title to 'linux-igd follows old UPnP IGD V1 spec' from 'linux-igd
i
retitle 699351 linux-igd follows old UPnP IGD V1 spec
thanks
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:32 AM, VALETTE Eric OLNC/OLPS
wrote:
> Look at the CVE that have been filled regarding libupnp6 and the associated
> bugs.
Thanks - they have been fixed in libupnp4 [1]. I've renamed the bug
appropriately. I
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:32 AM, VALETTE Eric OLNC/OLPS
wrote:
> Look at the CVE that have been filled regarding libupnp6 and the associated
> bugs.
Thanks, I'll put something on libupnp4's debian BTS so it's on their radar.
>> Are there security problems with linux-igd independent of libupnp4?
On 01/30/2013 10:26 PM, Scott Howard
wrote:
Hello Eric,
You wrote:
"Linux-igd is dead code, use very old libpunp version that contains
numerous security holes. Besides this version is not compatible with
IPV6 as required by UPnP IGD V2 specification."
I believe yo
Hello Eric,
You wrote:
"Linux-igd is dead code, use very old libpunp version that contains
numerous security holes. Besides this version is not compatible with
IPV6 as required by UPnP IGD V2 specification."
I believe you mean libupnp4 contains numerous security holes - have
they been reported in
6 matches
Mail list logo
