On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 03:38:31PM +1300, Matthew Grant wrote:
> Why does the Wheezy release team have its nose so stuck up about a minor
> upstream version number?
>
> 9.8.4-P1 IS ISC's official bug fixed release of the 9.8.x source tree ,
> INCLUDING 9.8.1*
>
> Don't drive the security maintain
Why does the Wheezy release team have its nose so stuck up about a minor
upstream version number?
9.8.4-P1 IS ISC's official bug fixed release of the 9.8.x source tree ,
INCLUDING 9.8.1*
Don't drive the security maintainers into loops about unsupported code in
an upcoming stable release!
Sheesh,
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 05:25:36AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:31:00AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Package: bind9
> > Severity: grave
> > Tags: security
> > Justification: user security hole
> > Please see https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00828
> > Stable is not af
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:31:00AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: bind9
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
> Please see https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00828
> Stable is not affected. This needs to be fixed through
> testing-proposed-updates,
> since
Package: bind9
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Please see https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00828
Stable is not affected. This needs to be fixed through testing-proposed-updates,
since the testing and unstable packages have diverged and won't be updated that
late in t
5 matches
Mail list logo