Hi,
On 10/23/2012 09:35 AM, Samuel Bronson wrote:
> On Oct 21, 2012, at 12:34 AM, Guo Yixuan wrote:
>> The packages in unstable are updated to 4.7 (or 4.6 on some archs)[1],
>
> I actually knew this; I can't think why I didn't say so in the report.
>
>> and waiting for release team's unblock gra
On Oct 21, 2012, at 12:34 AM, Guo Yixuan wrote:
The packages in unstable are updated to 4.7 (or 4.6 on some archs)[1],
I actually knew this; I can't think why I didn't say so in the report.
and waiting for release team's unblock grant.
This part I didn't know. Thanks!
Thanks, also, for pic
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 689967
Bug #691074 [gcc-doc] gcc-doc: Depends on docs for wrong gcc version
691074 was not blocked by any bugs.
691074 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 691074: 689967
--
691074: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691074
Control: block -1 by 689967
Hi Samuel,
On 10/21/2012 09:54 AM, Samuel Bronson wrote:
> Package: gcc-doc
> Version: 5:3
> Severity: serious
>
> Dear Maintainer,
> I've noticed that gcc-doc is still depending on the documentation for
> the aging GCC 4.4...
The packages in unstable are updated t
Package: gcc-doc
Version: 5:3
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
I've noticed that gcc-doc is still depending on the documentation for
the aging GCC 4.4...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimenta
5 matches
Mail list logo