On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 12:20:11AM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Keith Rarick wrote:
> > You can see the change at
> >
> > https://github.com/kr/beanstalkd/compare/fiu
Thanks. No need for an upstream release.
I'll also drop "-i" from the fiu-ctrl invocation (it's
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Keith Rarick wrote:
> You can see the change at
>
> https://github.com/kr/beanstalkd/compare/fiu
Just to be really explicit, the only relevant change right
now is https://github.com/kr/beanstalkd/commit/3176e28.
That compare view also lists another patch, for dpr
Indeed, the command line flags for fiu-ctrl have changed.
The old flags (-e and -d) are still accepted but sliently
ignored; instead of a proper error message, it simply
produced incorrect behavior.
I updated the tests that use FIU and now all tests pass
for me. You can see the change at
https://
Small update: I've reproduced this myself. It seems to be
because of a difference in FIU from 0.14 to 0.90.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
That's fine Keith. Let me know please when you have something ready.
--
Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hey, sorry, I didn't mean to imply that I wouldn't make a
fix. I said before I'm happy to maintain 1.4.x for several
years and that's still true.
As part of my responsibility maintaining 1.4.x, I was just
trying to start with the most expedient reasonable option,
which would have been to use libev
Keith,
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 05:03:45PM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote:
> If libevent 1.4 is not an option, I'll get the 1.4.x series of beanstalkd
> working with libevent 2 and make a bugfix release.
Not, it's not an option.
> Should I do that?
Your previous email sort of implied that you wouldn'
If libevent 1.4 is not an option, I'll get the 1.4.x series of beanstalkd
working with libevent 2 and make a bugfix release.
Should I do that?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
A number of people have reported problems using libevent 2.
I'd suggest sticking to libevent 1.4; that is the version that
beanstalkd was developed and tested with.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li
Hi Keith,
beanstalkd 1.4.6 does not pass anymore the test binlog-diskfull-delete.sh.
(Just a reminder: 1.4.6 is the version intended for the upcoming Debian
stable, since 1.5 & 1.6 had failing tests and were not fixed before the Debian
freeze deadline.)
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 03:07:51PM +0200, L
Source: beanstalkd
Version: 1.4.6-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120912 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]:
11 matches
Mail list logo
