On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:07:24 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > I've prepared an NMU for gdal (versioned as 1.9.0-3.1) and
> > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> > should delay it longer.
> Ok, even if I'm starting to think that in jassie we should simply
> drop rub
On 19/09/2012 16:29, gregor herrmann wrote:
- a binary package libgdal-ruby (meta package depending on
libgdal-ruby1.8)
Hmpf… Sorry, I missed this point. I checked the list of packages on the
PTS and didn't try to analyze inter-packages relations further.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
T
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:46:53 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> >I've prepared an NMU for gdal (versioned as 1.9.0-3.1) and uploaded
> >it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it
> >longer.
> I see there is a binary package libgdal-ruby1.8 from source package
> gdal. Do we need bo
On 18/09/2012 17:50, gregor herrmann wrote:
I've prepared an NMU for gdal (versioned as 1.9.0-3.1) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it
longer.
I see there is a binary package libgdal-ruby1.8 from source package
gdal. Do we need both?
Regards,
--
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 05:50:40PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> tags 684433 + pending
> thanks
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for gdal (versioned as 1.9.0-3.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
>
> Regards.
>
Ok, even
tags 684433 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for gdal (versioned as 1.9.0-3.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
: :' : Debian
6 matches
Mail list logo
