Hi Thijs,
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 13:45 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> What is the status of the ceph packages and this bug? It seems there are
> problems building the release currently in unstable, but do you think that
> a new version can be uploaded to address this? Would be great to see ceph
>
Hi Laszlo,
What is the status of the ceph packages and this bug? It seems there are
problems building the release currently in unstable, but do you think that
a new version can be uploaded to address this? Would be great to see ceph
back in jessie.
Cheers,
Thijs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
I want to get it all right this time, finally. My bugreport
was wrong and confusing from the start, and I messed up with
it several times after that.
So, what I mean was really to have shlibs file with the right
versions (which was missing for both librbd and librados), OR
symbols files (also for
Please excuse me for all the noize I just did.
I tried to unmerge the two bugs, but it didn't
work right. Hopefully I restored everything
back.
But the thing is: #679686 has NOT been fixed.
Instead, now the package FTBFS on almost all
arches -- see the QA page (*) and the build
logs linked from t
4 matches
Mail list logo
