On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:30:06 +0200, Rémi Vanicat wrote:
>
>> So I've uploaded a version that just add what is needed for the ruby1.8
>> to be build correctly (and I've added myself as an uploader).
>>
> Seems to FTBFS on the kbsd buildds
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:30:06 +0200, Rémi Vanicat wrote:
> So I've uploaded a version that just add what is needed for the ruby1.8
> to be build correctly (and I've added myself as an uploader).
>
Seems to FTBFS on the kbsd buildds.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-r
Julien Cristau writes:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 00:23:38 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
>
>> Am Sonntag, den 17.06.2012, 21:11 +0200 schrieb Rémi Vanicat:
>> > The attached patch solve the FTBS.
>>
>> Can you please read [1] and check if we follow their rules? We need to
>> rename the ruby packag
Am Montag, den 18.06.2012, 00:38 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 00:23:38 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
>
> > Am Sonntag, den 17.06.2012, 21:11 +0200 schrieb Rémi Vanicat:
> > > The attached patch solve the FTBS.
> >
> > Can you please read [1] and check if we follow their
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 00:23:38 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 17.06.2012, 21:11 +0200 schrieb Rémi Vanicat:
> > The attached patch solve the FTBS.
>
> Can you please read [1] and check if we follow their rules? We need to
> rename the ruby package. Can make this package support
Am Sonntag, den 17.06.2012, 21:11 +0200 schrieb Rémi Vanicat:
> The attached patch solve the FTBS.
Can you please read [1] and check if we follow their rules? We need to
rename the ruby package. Can make this package support all supported
ruby versions?
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-an
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 21:11:39 +0200, Rémi Vanicat wrote:
> Julien, could you delay the nmu more for a less intrusive patch to be
> found?
>
Rescheduled to 5 days.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
Rémi Vanicat writes:
[...]
> The attached patch solve the FTBS, but I don't know if I don't miss
> something as my ruby & xmms apps are only half working with this
> (https://github.com/vanicat/xmms-gtk-rater).
More test show that it was an incompatibility between my software and
ruby1.9, The p
Benjamin Drung writes:
> Am Sonntag, den 17.06.2012, 13:08 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau:
>> I've prepared an NMU for xmms2 (versioned as 0.8+dfsg-2.1) and
>> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
>> should delay it longer.
>
> Dropping the ruby package seems to be the wrong f
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 15:23:16 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
>
>> Am Sonntag, den 17.06.2012, 13:08 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau:
>> > I've prepared an NMU for xmms2 (versioned as 0.8+dfsg-2.1) and
>> > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 15:23:16 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 17.06.2012, 13:08 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> > I've prepared an NMU for xmms2 (versioned as 0.8+dfsg-2.1) and
> > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> > should delay it longer.
>
> Droppin
Am Sonntag, den 17.06.2012, 13:08 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> I've prepared an NMU for xmms2 (versioned as 0.8+dfsg-2.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
Dropping the ruby package seems to be the wrong fix. xmms2 fails to
build due to t
tags 676100 + patch
tags 676100 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for xmms2 (versioned as 0.8+dfsg-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Cheers,
Julien
diff -Nru xmms2-0.8+dfsg/debian/changelog xmms2-0.8+dfsg/debian/chang
13 matches
Mail list logo