On 09/01/13 21:54, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 09.01.2013 22:29, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> As far as I can work out, bumping libgstreamer0.10-0's shlibs
>> would only help to achieve this if we additionally NMU a bunch of
>> packages to rebuild them against the new libgstreamer0.10-0 so
>> they get a
On 09.01.2013 22:29, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 01/01/13 13:26, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 23:28:13 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
>>> I've only tested this fairly trivially (totem still plays
>>> videos); I'll do some more testing before uploading if it becomes
>>> necessary, b
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 21:29:11 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> The broken situation is that at runtime, you have a "new" libglib2.0-0,
> an "old" libgstreamer0.10-0, and a "new" third-package.
>
That situation can be prevented by making sure every "new" third-package
has versioned depends on "ne
On 01/01/13 13:26, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 23:28:13 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> I've only tested this fairly trivially (totem still plays
>> videos); I'll do some more testing before uploading if it becomes
>> necessary, but it'd be better if a maintainer could do proper
4 matches
Mail list logo
