On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 21:09:33 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2012-04-07 20:39 +0200, Marc Singer wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >>
> >> Apparently shellinaboxd is statically linked with ssl, which is bad.
>
> Sorry, should have read the build logs more c
From: Marc Singer
Date: Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: Bug#667938: shellinabox: depends on unavailable packages
To: Sven Joachim
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2012-04-07 21:27 +0200, Marc Singer wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 12
On 2012-04-07 21:27 +0200, Marc Singer wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> It dlopens libssl.so which is not good, since that file only exists if
>> libssl-dev is installed.
>
> Are you sure about that.
Yes, use "dpkg -S libssl.so" to convince yourself.
>> ls -l l
From: Marc Singer
Date: Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: Bug#667938: shellinabox: depends on unavailable packages
To: Sven Joachim
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2012-04-07 20:39 +0200, Marc Singer wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 10
On 2012-04-07 20:39 +0200, Marc Singer wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>> Apparently shellinaboxd is statically linked with ssl, which is bad.
Sorry, should have read the build logs more carefully and actually
peeked in the source code.
> No, it's dynamically li
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2012-04-07 19:34 +0200, Marc Singer wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >
> >> Package: shellinabox
> >> Version: 2.11-1
> >> Severity: grave
> >>
> >> Your package is not installable:
> >>
> >>
> > I though
On 2012-04-07 19:34 +0200, Marc Singer wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> Package: shellinabox
>> Version: 2.11-1
>> Severity: grave
>>
>> Your package is not installable:
>>
>>
> I thought that that might come back to haunt me. Part of the trouble is
> that the sh
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Package: shellinabox
> Version: 2.11-1
> Severity: grave
>
> Your package is not installable:
>
>
I thought that that might come back to haunt me. Part of the trouble is
that the shlib:depends automatic
dependency won't include libssl. Do yo
Package: shellinabox
Version: 2.11-1
Severity: grave
Your package is not installable:
,
| $ LANG=C apt-get -s install shellinabox
| [ ... ]
| The following packages have unmet dependencies:
| shellinabox : Depends: lsb-bbase but it is not installable
|Depends: libssl0.9.8 (>=
9 matches
Mail list logo
